Biologists and Computer Scientists
Much has been said about (and blamed upon) communication problems between biologists and computer scientists. But after attending a meeting with biologists and computer scientists this week, I am starting to suspect that the problem isn’t just communication.
The main problem may be that there is often a conflict of interests. From a computer science point of view, biology may seem like a perfect testing ground for interesting theories. But there seems to be little interest in compromising the purity of any theories, even though theories often need to be watered down to make them useful (consider relational databases). Moreover, the most challenging theories may not be the ones that help address the most pressing issues biologists face.
Biologists on the other hand often couldn’t care less if something is implemented in a sound manner or not (even though it should be in their long term interest to do so).
Then there are people like me, who don’t care if the biology makes sense – if people find it useful – and who don’t care if the computer science is sound – if it works :-)
February 15th, 2006 at 21:33
Hi Eric,
This is a nice analysis.
Biologists (I’m one of them!) cannot wait for the “next version of the tool” when biological samples are waiting on the bench, cannot wait for a database change when it is so easy to write the result *now* in excel, etc… Bioinformatics would be a better place to work if there were no biologists :-)
Pierre
February 21st, 2006 at 14:40
Hi Eric,
we met us at the EPFL meeting. I agree with you, that’s a real problem. Perhaps you will be interested in my two posts about this problem.
Fabrice